Fifteen years designing programs, hiring and coaching the people who teach them, and running the business underneath. I founded a school and scaled it to 10,000+ students, and before that I built the entire digital course area of one of Latin America's best creative schools. I've never taught anything I wasn't doing — advertising, then content, now AI.
I have never taught a subject I was only reading about. Each time I was already doing the work professionally, saw that nobody was training anyone for it yet, and built the program — the curriculum, the faculty, the launch, the numbers. Three eras, three separate bodies of evidence, one repeatable method.
The subject keeps changing. The method hasn't changed once.
A CV read top to bottom makes this look inconsistent. It isn't. The two tracks ran at the same time for fifteen years — first a job in advertising with the teaching at night and on Saturdays, then Grow as my full-time company from 2018 to 2025, and now FSSC. The teaching was never a break from the practice. It was fed by it.
The overlap is the whole argument. I was writing campaigns at Ogilvy while designing the first digital creativity course in the country. I was running Grow's own marketing while building its curriculum. Today I'm doing content work at FSSC while taking an AI program through its governance. Same shape, three times.
Three schools, a set of tools, and what the press made of it. Each one is a full case — what the problem was, what I built, and what I'd do differently.





I'm looking for the role where the enablement work is the job, not the thing I do on top of it — AI enablement, L&D, or an academy to build — in an English-first company.
EU work permit through 2030, no sponsorship required · currently Content Officer at FSSC.